I Discovered Zara in Milan 20 Years Ago. I Didn't Know It Was Teaching Me How to Shop.
A Zara brand experience that started in Milan and became a lesson in how brands teach us what to expect.
I first discovered Zara in Milan during a short trip I took with my friend Penny in 2006. I had gotten married earlier that year and had moved to La Maddalena, Italy, a few months prior, when Penny, a close friend and past coworker from Australia, decided to visit me. She asked if I wanted to do a quick 3-day retail therapy trip to Milan since we were so close, and there was no reason not to go.
I had never heard of Zara before, but I remember walking into the store close to the Piazza del Duomo and absolutely loving it. It was fashion-forward, European-style clothes that felt like you were in a high-end boutique store without paying luxury prices. At the time, I didn't know anything about Zara's business model, its supply chain, or the term “fast fashion.”
I just knew I really enjoyed shopping there. When we moved to Japan a few years after that, I was happy to see there were a couple of Zara stores in Tokyo, and they still had that same high-end store feel, while the more affordable pricing kept my pockets happy.
When we moved to San Diego in 2010, Zara still didn't feel particularly mainstream to me, especially on the West Coast.
It turns out there was a reason for that.
Zara had actually entered the United States more than 20 years earlier, opening its first U.S. store in New York in 1989. But its expansion across the country was surprisingly gradual. Zara didn't open its first West Coast location until 2004, at South Coast Plaza in Costa Mesa; it was only the brand's 13th U.S. store at the time.
When my family and I moved to San Diego in 2010, there wasn't a Zara here yet. It was in 2012 that the first San Diego store opened at Fashion Valley. That got me excited and nostalgic for the time I first found the brand in Milan.
Looking back helps explain why my experience of Zara 20 years ago feels so different from the Zara we know today.
But truth be told, it’s not just geography that makes this brand feel different. I wasn’t, because I first experienced it living overseas. It’s also because:
Zara taught me how to shop Zara.
Sounds odd, right? But there were certain things I came to understand as a Zara customer.
One of those was that if I saw something I liked, I should probably buy it, because there was a good chance it wouldn't be there the next time I came back. Zara carried relatively small quantities of individual styles, and merchandise turned over quickly.
Which brings me to the next thing I learned: Don’t expect special holiday sales, weekend sales, or regular discounts. I distinctly remember that Zara didn’t participate in the constant promotional cycle we all are accustomed to seeing from many other retailers. I even remember being told by a Zara employee that the big sales happened only twice a year, at the end of each season.
At the time, I didn't think of any of this as branding; it was just how Zara operated.
Years later, I began noticing sales appearing at other times of the year. I can't tell you exactly when I first noticed the change, but I remember that it caught my attention. It wasn’t a specific holiday or special occasion. And it wasn’t because seeing a retailer have a sale was unusual.
But it was Zara that had a sale that was outside the end-of-season cycle. That’s what caught my eye, because my expectations of Zara had already been formed for years.
Scarcity at mass-market prices
The more I've gone back and researched the Zara of that period, the more I understand why the experience felt the way it did.
Historically, Zara concentrated its markdowns into two major end-of-season sale periods and used minimal promotion during the regular selling season.
Its inventory strategy reinforced that behavior. Rather than producing enormous quantities of every style and leaving them on the floor for months, Zara became known for smaller production runs, rapid product turnover, and a steady stream of new merchandise. Its ability to respond quickly to trends and move new designs into stores became a defining part of its model.
If something didn't sell, it could disappear quickly. If something did sell, there was no guarantee you would find it again. That created an interesting contradiction.
Zara was fast fashion, but it wasn’t a luxury house.
Its pricing made fashion trends accessible to a much broader customer base. But interestingly, some of the behaviors its operating model created felt much closer to things we associate with more premium or exclusive brands, things such as:
Scarcity. Discovery. Limited discounting. Desirable retail locations.
And the feeling that if you wanted access to something, you shouldn't necessarily wait.
Zara essentially made fashion more economically accessible while making individual pieces feel less permanently accessible, and I find that distinction absolutely fascinating.
None of this was the logo.
As someone in branding, I find these stories too good to keep to myself. A simple three-day shopping trip 20 years ago has somehow come full circle, helping me see just how much of branding happens beyond the visual.
What taught me how to perceive Zara wasn't only the wordmark or a particular advertising campaign. It wasn’t a color palette or a website. It was the experience of being a customer:
The on-hand inventory taught me not to wait.
The sale strategy taught me not to expect a discount.
The changing assortment taught me there would always be something new to discover.
The limited store footprint affected how easily I could access the brand.
Even the location of the stores contributed to how the brand felt.
Those were operational decisions. But collectively, they shaped what Zara meant to me.
By the time Zara eventually behaved differently, I noticed because the brand had already taught me what to expect from it.
Then access started changing.
One detail in Zara's U.S. history that I noticed while researching this was when Zara launched nationwide U.S. e-commerce in September 2011.
I had moved to San Diego only the year before. But until then, my ability to shop at Zara depended largely on whether I could physically get to a store. Suddenly, the collection became accessible online throughout all 50 states.
Then Zara came to San Diego, and its U.S. presence continued expanding. Today, Zara has stores throughout California, and the United States has become Inditex's second-largest market by sales after Spain.
The brand that once felt like something I had discovered while living overseas became something I could access much more easily at home.
That isn't necessarily good or bad. Growth is generally what businesses are working toward.
But it raises a question I hadn't thought about:
What happens to a brand experience when access changes?
And maybe even more so:
How do you grow without unintentionally changing some of the things people came to associate with you in the first place?
Brands teach us what to expect.
Who knew that Zara having a sale outside of its normal end-of-season sales would be something I'd notice and question?
But this is an area of branding I really love, and lately I've realized that many of my own experiences with brands have happened beyond the visual.
They’re experiences I remember because of how a brand made me feel, how it behaved, the environment it created, what I learned to expect from it, or even something as simple as a sound I immediately associate with it.
So I've been going back through some of those personal experiences and dusting off the archives of my brain (apparently I need more ginkgo), looking at them again through the lens of what I know about branding.
And it has sent me down a rabbit hole … a fun one for me.
There are so many areas of branding that don't always get the same attention as the visual side does. Sound. Space. Service. Behavior. Environment. Purpose. Even operational decisions, like the ones that shaped my experience with Zara.
So throughout October, I'm going to explore some of them through Beyond the Visual, a special Maven Memos series about the different ways we experience brands and how those experiences create recognition, association, and meaning.
I'll be pulling from real brands, my own experiences, and probably a few more stories I've forgotten are sitting in the archives.
If that sounds like a rabbit hole you'd like to go down with me, you can join Maven Memos below.
If your business has evolved and you're considering what your brand needs now, explore how Intrinsic Maven approaches brand development through understanding, alignment, and stewardship.
Comments